On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
>
> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
> the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:05:02AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> > > >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct
> > > >> xgene_dma *pdma)
> > > >> /* Register
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Why would I? Those helpers are core internal and not usable in random
> > drivers.
> >
>
> i think the problem is the name of the function. It should be something
>
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Suman Tripathi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
>> > > >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> > >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct xgene_dma
> > >> *pdma)
> > >> /* Register DMA channel rx irq */
> > >> for (i = 0; i < XGENE_DMA_MAX_CHANNEL;
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
>> >> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> >> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
> >>
> >> For interrupt controller that doesn't support
Hi Vinod,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
>> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
>>
>> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
>> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
>
> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
> the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> >> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
> >>
> >> For
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> > >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct xgene_dma
> > >> *pdma)
> > >> /* Register DMA channel rx irq */
> > >> for (i = 0; i < XGENE_DMA_MAX_CHANNEL;
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
>
> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
> the issue by setting
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Suman Tripathi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
>> > > >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Why would I? Those helpers are core internal and not usable in random
> > drivers.
> >
>
> i think the problem is the name of the function. It should be something
>
>
Hi Vinod,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
>> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
>>
>> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
>> with level
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
>
> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
> the issue by setting
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:05:02AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> > > >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct
> > > >> xgene_dma *pdma)
> > > >> /* Register
From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference:
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c
From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference:
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c
24 matches
Mail list logo