Alan Cox wrote:
Ok try this one then
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~2007-04-05 16:30:30.817515360
+0100
+++ Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2007-04-05 16:48:15.557650256 +0100
Ok try this one then
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~2007-04-05 16:30:30.817515360
+0100
+++ Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2007-04-05 16:48:15.557650256 +0100
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
EIDEEIDE/ATAPI support is enabled.
Alan Cox wrote:
Alan wrote:
| NAK. IA-32 is an Intel specific term, and I believe a protected mark at
| that.
OMG, quick, please send a patch for Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
(big ;)
Its a lot simpler to use sed. Can't find IA32 as a mark, seems the Itanic
one was but not that.
> Alan wrote:
> | NAK. IA-32 is an Intel specific term, and I believe a protected mark at
> | that.
>
> OMG, quick, please send a patch for Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
> (big ;)
Its a lot simpler to use sed. Can't find IA32 as a mark, seems the Itanic
one was but not that. X86-32 is
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:41:52 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Use documented tag for "IA-32" (not "i386") to indicate which
> > kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
>
> mv arch/i386 arch/ia32 ;)
>
> Seriously, is there any
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Use documented tag for "IA-32" (not "i386") to indicate which
> kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
NAK. IA-32 is an Intel specific term, and I believe a protected mark at
that.
Randy Dunlap wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use documented tag for "IA-32" (not "i386") to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
We call this architecture "i386" everywhere else. I think it makes more
sense to change the documented tag to "i386", especially with
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use documented tag for "IA-32" (not "i386") to indicate which
> kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
mv arch/i386 arch/ia32 ;)
Seriously, is there any point in this? Kernel uses the i386 terminology
and surely there's no
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use documented tag for "IA-32" (not "i386") to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use documented tag for IA-32 (not i386) to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
mv arch/i386 arch/ia32 ;)
Seriously, is there any point in this? Kernel uses the i386 terminology
and surely there's no
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use documented tag for IA-32 (not i386) to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
Randy Dunlap wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use documented tag for IA-32 (not i386) to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
We call this architecture i386 everywhere else. I think it makes more
sense to change the documented tag to i386, especially with Intel
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use documented tag for IA-32 (not i386) to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
NAK. IA-32 is an Intel specific term, and I believe a protected mark at
that.
-
To
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:41:52 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use documented tag for IA-32 (not i386) to indicate which
kernel parameters apply to IA-32.
mv arch/i386 arch/ia32 ;)
Seriously, is there any point in this?
Alan wrote:
| NAK. IA-32 is an Intel specific term, and I believe a protected mark at
| that.
OMG, quick, please send a patch for Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
(big ;)
Its a lot simpler to use sed. Can't find IA32 as a mark, seems the Itanic
one was but not that. X86-32 is more
Alan Cox wrote:
Alan wrote:
| NAK. IA-32 is an Intel specific term, and I believe a protected mark at
| that.
OMG, quick, please send a patch for Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
(big ;)
Its a lot simpler to use sed. Can't find IA32 as a mark, seems the Itanic
one was but not that.
Ok try this one then
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~2007-04-05 16:30:30.817515360
+0100
+++ Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2007-04-05 16:48:15.557650256 +0100
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
EIDEEIDE/ATAPI support is enabled.
Alan Cox wrote:
Ok try this one then
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~2007-04-05 16:30:30.817515360
+0100
+++ Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2007-04-05 16:48:15.557650256 +0100
Thanks.
18 matches
Mail list logo