Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:19:43 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for > our doc toolchain! Indeed. Applied, thanks. jon

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:19:43 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for > our doc toolchain! Indeed. Applied, thanks. jon

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for > our doc toolchain! > > v2: Make sure we don't have foo twice (Jani). Thanks, *now* LGTM. :) > > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jani Nikula

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for > our doc toolchain! > > v2: Make sure we don't have foo twice (Jani). Thanks, *now* LGTM. :) > > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc:

[PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for our doc toolchain! v2: Make sure we don't have foo twice (Jani). Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:

[PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for our doc toolchain! v2: Make sure we don't have foo twice (Jani). Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- Documentation/kernel-documentation.rst

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for >> our doc toolchain! > > Mea culpa. Thanks, LGTM. Oh, the example struct now has too

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for >> our doc toolchain! > > Mea culpa. Thanks, LGTM. Oh, the example struct now has too "foo" fields, documented twice. That's not good.

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for > our doc toolchain! Mea culpa. Thanks, LGTM. BR, Jani. > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Jonathan

Re: [PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for > our doc toolchain! Mea culpa. Thanks, LGTM. BR, Jani. > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Daniel

[PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for our doc toolchain! Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter ---

[PATCH] doc: Document the new inline struct member kernel-doc style

We don't just need better doc toolchains, we also need better docs for our doc toolchain! Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- Documentation/kernel-documentation.rst | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+),