Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:10:42 +0100 > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Mind sending me the final version, modified by you? > > OK, this is the current version. [...] Much appreciated! Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:10:42 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > Mind sending me the final version, modified by you? OK, this is the current version. For completeness (so to speak) I'll send the patches as well. jon completions - wait for completion handling ==

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > I wasn't Cc:-ed to the patch and it wasn't Cc:-ed to lkml either :-( > > > > /me hands mingo a strong cup of tea... > > > > http://marc.info/

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:28:48 -0500 > Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > > This hopfully address all of the issues Ingo Molnar noted > > in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/690. > > This looks OK to me, modulo some small English quibbles. Ingo, does this > satisfy your co

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > I wasn't Cc:-ed to the patch and it wasn't Cc:-ed to lkml either :-( > > /me hands mingo a strong cup of tea... > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142445364429042&w=2 > strange:

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > I wasn't Cc:-ed to the patch and it wasn't Cc:-ed to lkml either :-( > > /me hands mingo a strong cup of tea... > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142445364429042&w=2 Hm, then it somehow got sp

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I wasn't Cc:-ed to the patch and it wasn't Cc:-ed to lkml either :-( /me hands mingo a strong cup of tea... http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142445364429042&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:28:48 -0500 > Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > > This hopfully address all of the issues Ingo Molnar noted > > in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/690. > > This looks OK to me, modulo some small English quibbles. Ingo, does this > satisfy your co

Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-03-26 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:28:48 -0500 Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > This hopfully address all of the issues Ingo Molnar noted > in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/690. This looks OK to me, modulo some small English quibbles. Ingo, does this satisfy your concerns? Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from

[PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes

2015-02-20 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
Fix for imprecise/wrong statements on context in which wait_for_completion*() can be called, updated notes on "going out of scope" problems and some language fixups. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire --- This hopfully address all of the issues Ingo Molnar noted in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/1