Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:51:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:51:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:51:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > >> > Advice about what

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:51:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > >> > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >> > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since >> > patch

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >> > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since >> > patch series was merged to hash

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since > > patch series was merged to hash pointers printed with %p. We can use > > this as a

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since > > patch series was merged to hash pointers printed with %p. We can use > > this as a unique

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since > patch series was merged to hash pointers printed with %p. We can use > this as a unique identifier now. > > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding

Re: [PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since > patch series was merged to hash pointers printed with %p. We can use > this as a unique identifier now. > > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding I don't agree: %p

[PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since patch series was merged to hash pointers printed with %p. We can use this as a unique identifier now. Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding --- Documentation/security/self-protection.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed,

[PATCH] doc: update 'unique identifiers'

Advice about what to use as a unique identifier is no longer valid since patch series was merged to hash pointers printed with %p. We can use this as a unique identifier now. Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding --- Documentation/security/self-protection.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2