Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-02 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:00:16AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > > > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > > > This changelog

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-02 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:00:16AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Hi Dan, Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : This changelog doesn't

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:00:16AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > > > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > > > This changelog

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-01 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Yann, On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:02:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Up to 7 bytes are wasted at the end of struct platform_object > in the form of padding after name field: unfortunately this > padding is not used when allocating the memory to hold the > name. > > This patch converts

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-01 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi Dan, Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > > This changelog doesn't match the patch. > > > > > > > Hum, let me guess I've failed

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-01 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi Dan, Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : This changelog doesn't match the patch. Hum, let me guess I've failed to set the

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-01 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Yann, On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:02:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Up to 7 bytes are wasted at the end of struct platform_object in the form of padding after name field: unfortunately this padding is not used when allocating the memory to hold the name. This patch converts name

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-06-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:00:16AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Hi Dan, Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : This changelog doesn't

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-31 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > This changelog doesn't match the patch. > > > > Hum, let me guess I've failed to set the proper subject prefix > to add v6 suffic to PATCH: >

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-31 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi Dan, Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > This changelog doesn't match the patch. > Hum, let me guess I've failed to set the proper subject prefix to add v6 suffic to PATCH: I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like a new one.

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-31 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi Dan, Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : This changelog doesn't match the patch. Hum, let me guess I've failed to set the proper subject prefix to add v6 suffic to PATCH: I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like a new one. Is

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-31 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: Hi Dan, Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : This changelog doesn't match the patch. Hum, let me guess I've failed to set the proper subject prefix to add v6 suffic to PATCH: I've changed

[PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-30 Thread Yann Droneaud
Up to 7 bytes are wasted at the end of struct platform_object in the form of padding after name field: unfortunately this padding is not used when allocating the memory to hold the name. This patch converts name array from name[1] to C99 flexible array name[] (equivalent to name[0]) so that no

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-30 Thread Dan Carpenter
This changelog doesn't match the patch. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-30 Thread Dan Carpenter
This changelog doesn't match the patch. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

[PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

2014-05-30 Thread Yann Droneaud
Up to 7 bytes are wasted at the end of struct platform_object in the form of padding after name field: unfortunately this padding is not used when allocating the memory to hold the name. This patch converts name array from name[1] to C99 flexible array name[] (equivalent to name[0]) so that no