Re: [PATCH] drivers/block: Goodbye BLK_DEV_UMEM

2021-03-24 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/23/21 1:07 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > This removes the driver on the premise that it has been unused for a long > time. This is a better approach compared to changing untestable code nobody > cares about in the first place. Similarly, the umem.com website now shows a > mere Godaddy parking

Re: [PATCH] drivers/block: Goodbye BLK_DEV_UMEM

2021-03-23 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, Mar 23 2021, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > I'm also Ccing Neil, who is one of the authors. Thanks! I have no objection to the removal. The driver served its purpose at the time, but technology has moved on. Add Acked-by: NeilBrown if you like (not necessary). Thanks, NeilBrown > > On

Re: [PATCH] drivers/block: Goodbye BLK_DEV_UMEM

2021-03-23 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
I'm also Ccing Neil, who is one of the authors. On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Bueso wrote: This removes the driver on the premise that it has been unused for a long time. This is a better approach compared to changing untestable code nobody cares about in the first place. Similarly, the umem.com

[PATCH] drivers/block: Goodbye BLK_DEV_UMEM

2021-03-23 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
This removes the driver on the premise that it has been unused for a long time. This is a better approach compared to changing untestable code nobody cares about in the first place. Similarly, the umem.com website now shows a mere Godaddy parking add. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig