On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 19:39 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Are you going to resend a changed version of this?
Yes, I've been distracted by a few other things, but I suppose I should
do it :-)
Possibly tomorrow. Arnd, are you doing that helper you suggested to get
to the of_node or should I ?
Cheers,
B
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:10:47PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> So I've been annoyed lately with having a bunch of devices such as i2c
> eeproms (for use by VPDs, server world !) and other bits and pieces that
> I want to be able to identify from userspace, and possibly provide
> addition
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 08:45:58 Rob Herring wrote:
>>> > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *of_node)
>>> > {
>>> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 08:45:58 Rob Herring wrote:
>> > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *of_node)
>> > {
>> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>> > return NULL;
>> >
>> > return de
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 08:45:58 Rob Herring wrote:
> > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *of_node)
> > {
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > return dev->of_node;
> > }
> >
> > Adding the IS_ENABLED() in a lot of d
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 13:35:44 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 10:39 +1100, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> > >> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
>> > >> index 20da3ad..8c7b607 1006
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 13:35:44 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 10:39 +1100, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > >> index 20da3ad..8c7b607 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/base
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 10:39 +1100, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> >> index 20da3ad..8c7b607 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> >> @@ -493,6 +493,15 @@ static int device_add_attrs(struct device *dev)
>
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 10:37 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > So I've been annoyed lately with having a bunch of devices such as i2c
> > eeproms (for use by VPDs, server world !) and other bits and pieces that
> > I want to be able to
Hi Rob,
> struct device doesn't have an of_node member if !CONFIG_OF, so we'll
> need to disable this block in the preprocessor.
Scratch that, I was looking at the wrong header - we do indeed have the
of_node available independently of CONFIG_OF, and this makes the logic a
little cleaner.
Cheers
Hi Rob,
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
>> index 20da3ad..8c7b607 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
>> @@ -493,6 +493,15 @@ static int device_add_attrs(struct device *dev)
>> goto err_remove_dev_groups;
>> }
>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> So I've been annoyed lately with having a bunch of devices such as i2c
> eeproms (for use by VPDs, server world !) and other bits and pieces that
> I want to be able to identify from userspace, and possibly provide
> additional data
So I've been annoyed lately with having a bunch of devices such as i2c
eeproms (for use by VPDs, server world !) and other bits and pieces that
I want to be able to identify from userspace, and possibly provide
additional data about from FW.
Basically, it boils down to correlating the sysfs device
13 matches
Mail list logo
