Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwtracing: make coresight-* explicitly non-modular

2016-02-16 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On 16 February 2016 at 03:15, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:25:56PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >> On 14 February 2016 at 10:19, Paul Gortmaker >> wrote: >> > diff --git a/include/linux/amba/bus.h b/include/linux/amba/bus.h >> > index 9006c4e75cf7..3d8dcdd1aeae 10

Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwtracing: make coresight-* explicitly non-modular

2016-02-16 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:25:56PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On 14 February 2016 at 10:19, Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/amba/bus.h b/include/linux/amba/bus.h > > index 9006c4e75cf7..3d8dcdd1aeae 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/amba/bus.h > > +++ b/include/linux/amba/

Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwtracing: make coresight-* explicitly non-modular

2016-02-15 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On 14 February 2016 at 10:19, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > None of the Kconfig currently controlling compilation of any of > the files here are tristate, meaning that none of it currently > is being built as a module by anyone. > > We need not be concerned about .remove functions and blocking the > unb

[PATCH] drivers/hwtracing: make coresight-* explicitly non-modular

2016-02-14 Thread Paul Gortmaker
None of the Kconfig currently controlling compilation of any of the files here are tristate, meaning that none of it currently is being built as a module by anyone. We need not be concerned about .remove functions and blocking the unbind sysfs operations, since that was already done in a recent co