On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:45 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 08/18/2014 08:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
> >> it is an incomplete type. The only reason why it wo
On 08/18/2014 08:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
>> it is an incomplete type. The only reason why it works in GCC is
>> because GCC has a nonstandard extension that make
On 18/08/14 17:40, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 17:36 +0200, Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz wrote:
>> On 18/08/14 17:31, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
it
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 17:36 +0200, Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz wrote:
> On 18/08/14 17:31, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
> >> it is an incomplete type. The only reason w
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
> it is an incomplete type. The only reason why it works in GCC is
> because GCC has a nonstandard extension that makes it report as having a
> size of 1.
I know. I
On 18/08/14 17:31, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
>> it is an incomplete type. The only reason why it works in GCC is
>> because GCC has a nonstandard extension that makes it
On 08/16/2014 11:41 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 11:12 +0200, Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz wrote:
>> @@ -1835,11 +1830,11 @@ static void e1000_get_ethtool_stats(struct
>> net_device *netdev,
>> for (i = 0; i < E1000_GLOBAL_STATS_LEN; i++) {
>> switch (e1000_gstr
On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 11:12 +0200, Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz wrote:
> Fixed many errors/warnings and checks in e1000_ethtool.c reported by
> checkpatch.pl
Hello Krzysztof.
Just some trivial notes:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel
Fixed many errors/warnings and checks in e1000_ethtool.c reported by
checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 135 +++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet
9 matches
Mail list logo
