On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 08:42 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 06.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Joe Perches:
[]
> > And trivia:
> >
> > The !! uses with bool seem unnecessary and it's probably better
> > to make amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled to return bool.
[]
> > diff --git
Am 06.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Joe Perches:
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 16:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 16:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
> suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
> the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:07 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 05.05.20 um 16:01 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
> > suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
> > the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
> >
> >
Am 05.05.20 um 16:01 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of 1072
After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of 1072
bytes in function 'amdgpu_ras_feature_enable'
6 matches
Mail list logo
