Hi Yannick,
Thanks for testing this change.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:39 PM yannick Fertre
wrote:
>
> Hello Jagan, I tested your patch on the stm32mp1 board.
> Unfortunately, the dsi panel does not probe well with this patch. The
> problem is due to the panel which is placed in the node of the
Hi Heiko,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:05:43PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 10:13:06 CET schrieb Jagan Teki:
> > Usual I2C configured DSI bridge drivers have drm_bridge_add
> > in probe and mipi_dsi_attach in bridge attach functions.
> >
> > With, this approach the
Hello Jagan, I tested your patch on the stm32mp1 board.
Unfortunately, the dsi panel does not probe well with this patch. The
problem is due to the panel which is placed in the node of the dsi
bridge (no problem with i2c devices).
Regarding component bindings for stm drivers, I am currently
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 10:13:06 CET schrieb Jagan Teki:
> Usual I2C configured DSI bridge drivers have drm_bridge_add
> in probe and mipi_dsi_attach in bridge attach functions.
>
> With, this approach the drm pipeline is unable to find the
> dsi bridge in stm drm drivers since the
Usual I2C configured DSI bridge drivers have drm_bridge_add
in probe and mipi_dsi_attach in bridge attach functions.
With, this approach the drm pipeline is unable to find the
dsi bridge in stm drm drivers since the dw-mipi-dsi bridge is
adding drm bridge during bridge attach operations instead
5 matches
Mail list logo