Hi Doug,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:18:48PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:24 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:14 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll add this documentation into the comments of the yaml, but I'm not
> > > > going to try to impl
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:24 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:14 PM Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'll add this documentation into the comments of the yaml, but I'm not
> > > going to try to implement enforcement at the yaml level.
> >
> > Why not ? :-)
>
> B
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:21 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Dough.
>
> > >
> > > If we don't want to test that, I would at least document it in the DT
> > > bindings. It will be a good occasion to switch the bindings to YAML ;-)
> >
> > Interesting that you bring this up. Conversion to yaml is
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:14 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> > I'll add this documentation into the comments of the yaml, but I'm not
> > going to try to implement enforcement at the yaml level.
>
> Why not ? :-)
Because trying to describe anything in the yaml bindings that doesn't
fit in the
Hi Dough.
> >
> > If we don't want to test that, I would at least document it in the DT
> > bindings. It will be a good occasion to switch the bindings to YAML ;-)
>
> Interesting that you bring this up. Conversion to yaml is sitting
> waiting to land (or additional review comments):
>
> https:
Hi Doug,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:12:20PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:06 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:59:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:24 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:36:31PM -
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:06 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:59:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:24 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:36:31PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > > The ti-sn65dsi86 MI
Hi Doug,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:59:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:24 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:36:31PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> > > remapping of eDP lanes
Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-05-05 11:45:05)
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:44 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-05-04 21:36:31)
> > > regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DSI_LANES_REG,
> > >CHA_DSI_LANES_MASK, val);
> > >
> > > +
Hi
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:44 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-05-04 21:36:31)
> > The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> > remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion. Both of these
> > features have been described in the device tree
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:24 AM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:36:31PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> > remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion.
Hi Douglas,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:36:31PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion. Both of these
> features have been described in the device tree bindings
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-05-04 21:36:31)
> The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion. Both of these
> features have been described in the device tree bindings for the
> device since the beginning but were never implem
The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion. Both of these
features have been described in the device tree bindings for the
device since the beginning but were never implemented in the driver.
Implement both of them.
Part of t
14 matches
Mail list logo
