Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread Inki Dae
Applied. Thanks, Inki Dae 2012/9/7 Mandeep Singh Baines : > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't > think this will fix any bugs. > > Before: > > [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > [7.639507]

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread InKi Dae
Hi, 2012/9/6 Paul Menzel : > Dear Inki Dae, > > > Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae: > >> 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines : >> > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't >> > think this will fix any bugs. >> > >> > Before: >> > >> > [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Inki Dae, Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae: > 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines : > > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't > > think this will fix any bugs. > > > > Before: > > > > [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > > [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Inki Dae, Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae: 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org: The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread InKi Dae
Hi, 2012/9/6 Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net: Dear Inki Dae, Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae: 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org: The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs.

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-06 Thread Inki Dae
Applied. Thanks, Inki Dae 2012/9/7 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org: The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507]

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-05 Thread InKi Dae
Hi, 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines : > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't > think this will fix any bugs. > > Before: > > [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 > [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-05 Thread 김승우
Hi Mandeep, On 2012년 09월 06일 06:47, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't > think this will fix any bugs. > > Before: > > [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 > [7.639507]

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-05 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-05 Thread 김승우
Hi Mandeep, On 2012년 09월 06일 06:47, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507]

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-05 Thread InKi Dae
Hi, 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org: The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private

2012-09-05 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [