Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
2012/9/7 Mandeep Singh Baines :
> The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
> think this will fix any bugs.
>
> Before:
>
> [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> [7.639507]
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[
Hi,
2012/9/6 Paul Menzel :
> Dear Inki Dae,
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae:
>
>> 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines :
>> > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
>> > think this will fix any bugs.
>> >
>> > Before:
>> >
>> > [
Dear Inki Dae,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae:
> 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines :
> > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
> > think this will fix any bugs.
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> > [
Dear Inki Dae,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae:
2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org:
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[
Hi,
2012/9/6 Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net:
Dear Inki Dae,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae:
2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org:
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[
Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
2012/9/7 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org:
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507]
Hi,
2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines :
> The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
> think this will fix any bugs.
>
> Before:
>
> [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> [7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
> [
Hi Mandeep,
On 2012년 09월 06일 06:47, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
> think this will fix any bugs.
>
> Before:
>
> [7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> [7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> [7.639507]
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[
Hi Mandeep,
On 2012년 09월 06일 06:47, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507]
Hi,
2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org:
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file
The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[
14 matches
Mail list logo