Hi Heinrich,
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160822]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for
convenience) to record w
Hi Heinrich,
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160822]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for
convenience) to record w
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:29:17 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
> > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
> > exposed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heinrich S
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
> initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
> exposed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 inser
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
> initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
> exposed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Might be a silly question, but where exactly would we expo
On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 21:35 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/21/2016 08:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:39 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
> > > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
On 08/21/2016 08:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:39 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
>> initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
>> exposed.
>
> How was this found? visual code inspection?
cppcheck
On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:39 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
> initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
> exposed.
How was this found? visual code inspection?
And isn't this true for mrst_lvds_find_best_pll as well?
> a
Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be
initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be
exposed.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
b/
9 matches
Mail list logo