Applied to drm-misc-next.
Regards,
Qiang
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:24 PM Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/4/21 1:39 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2021-02-03 02:01, Qiang Yu wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:02 PM Lukasz Luba wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2/2/21 1:01 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
On 2/4/21 1:39 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-02-03 02:01, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:02 PM Lukasz Luba wrote:
On 2/2/21 1:01 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
Hi Lukasz,
Thanks for the explanation. So the deferred timer option makes a
mistake that
when GPU goes from idle to busy f
On 2021-02-03 02:01, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:02 PM Lukasz Luba wrote:
On 2/2/21 1:01 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
Hi Lukasz,
Thanks for the explanation. So the deferred timer option makes a mistake that
when GPU goes from idle to busy for only one poll periodic, in this
case 50ms,
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:02 PM Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/2/21 1:01 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > Hi Lukasz,
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation. So the deferred timer option makes a mistake
> > that
> > when GPU goes from idle to busy for only one poll periodic, in this
> > case 50ms, right?
>
>
On 2/2/21 1:01 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
Hi Lukasz,
Thanks for the explanation. So the deferred timer option makes a mistake that
when GPU goes from idle to busy for only one poll periodic, in this
case 50ms, right?
Not exactly. Driver sets the polling interval to 50ms (in this case)
because it n
Hi Lukasz,
Thanks for the explanation. So the deferred timer option makes a mistake that
when GPU goes from idle to busy for only one poll periodic, in this
case 50ms, right?
But delayed timer will wakeup CPU every 50ms even when system is idle, will this
cause more power consumption for the case
Hi Qiang,
On 1/30/21 1:51 PM, Qiang Yu wrote:
Thanks for the patch. But I can't observe any difference on glmark2
with or without this patch.
Maybe you can provide other test which can benefit from it.
This is a design problem and has impact on the whole system.
There is a few issues. When the
Thanks for the patch. But I can't observe any difference on glmark2
with or without this patch.
Maybe you can provide other test which can benefit from it.
Considering it will wake up CPU more frequently, and user may choose
to change this by sysfs,
I'd like to not apply it.
Regards,
Qiang
On We
Devfreq framework supports 2 modes for monitoring devices.
Use delayed timer as default instead of deferrable timer
in order to monitor the GPU status regardless of CPU idle.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba
---
Hi all,
I've missed the Lima driver while working on Panfrost patch for fixing
the issue w
9 matches
Mail list logo