On 01/22/2016 08:54 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2016 08:01 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just
On Friday 22 January 2016 08:01 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
since it also caused build breakage
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
> to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
> since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> functions without our
On 01/22/2016 08:54 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2016 08:01 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
> to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
> since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> functions without our
On Friday 22 January 2016 08:01 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
since it also caused build breakage
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
> to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
> since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> functions without our
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
> to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
> since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> functions without our
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
> to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
> since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> functions without our
I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
functions without our Kconfig depending on PM_SLEEP.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
> to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
> since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> functions without our
I've tested and confirmed that it doesn't actually work. We'll need
to sort out how to do this properly later, but for now just remove it
since it also caused build breakage due to using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
functions without our Kconfig depending on PM_SLEEP.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
12 matches
Mail list logo
