On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:43:50 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
> > to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
> > paths. Fix it to be ,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:43:50 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
On 16 September 2014 23:43, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
>> to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
>> paths. Fix it to be , which matches
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
> to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
> paths. Fix it to be , which matches the rest of the driver drm
> header files that get
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
paths. Fix it to be drm/drm.h, which matches the rest of the
On 16 September 2014 23:43, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc
On 08/09/14 13:15, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> To the VMware guys,
>>
>> Any objections if we update the libdrm header and drop the mesa/ddx copies ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emil
> Hi!
>
> vmwgfx libdrm is pretty obsolete and AFAIK not used
On 08/09/14 13:14, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
[snip]
>> Any objections if we update the libdrm header and drop the mesa/ddx copies ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emil
>>
>> P.S. I'm against the patch in any way :)
>
> Was that meant to say "I'm not against the
Hi!
On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Josh
>
> On 05/09/14 18:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
>> to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
>> paths. Fix it to be , which matches
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Josh
>
> On 05/09/14 18:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
>> to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
>> paths. Fix it to be , which
Hi Josh
On 05/09/14 18:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
> The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
> to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
> paths. Fix it to be , which matches the rest of the driver drm
> header files that get
Hi Josh
On 05/09/14 18:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
paths. Fix it to be drm/drm.h, which matches the rest of the driver drm
header files that get
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Emil Velikov emil.l.veli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Josh
On 05/09/14 18:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
paths. Fix it to
Hi!
On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Josh
On 05/09/14 18:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
paths. Fix it to be drm/drm.h, which matches
On 08/09/14 13:14, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Emil Velikov emil.l.veli...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Any objections if we update the libdrm header and drop the mesa/ddx copies ?
Cheers,
Emil
P.S. I'm against the patch in any way :)
Was that meant to say I'm not
On 08/09/14 13:15, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi!
On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
[snip]
To the VMware guys,
Any objections if we update the libdrm header and drop the mesa/ddx copies ?
Cheers,
Emil
Hi!
vmwgfx libdrm is pretty obsolete and AFAIK not used by anyone.
As
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
paths. Fix it to be , which matches the rest of the driver drm
header files that get installed into /usr/include/drm.
Red Hat Bugzilla:
The userspace drm.h include doesn't prefix the drm directory. This can lead
to compile failures as /usr/include/drm/ isn't in the standard gcc include
paths. Fix it to be drm/drm.h, which matches the rest of the driver drm
header files that get installed into /usr/include/drm.
Red Hat Bugzilla:
18 matches
Mail list logo