Quoting Douglas Anderson (2018-11-27 11:24:43)
> The #reset-cells was listed as optional in the bindings for
> qcom,sdm845-videocc. There's no reason for it to be optional. As per
> Stephen [1]:
>
> > We should update the binding to make it a required property. It
> > doesn't make any sense why
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2018-11-27 11:24:43)
> The #reset-cells was listed as optional in the bindings for
> qcom,sdm845-videocc. There's no reason for it to be optional. As per
> Stephen [1]:
>
> > We should update the binding to make it a required property. It
> > doesn't make any sense why
The #reset-cells was listed as optional in the bindings for
qcom,sdm845-videocc. There's no reason for it to be optional. As per
Stephen [1]:
> We should update the binding to make it a required property. It
> doesn't make any sense why that property would be optional given
> that the hardware
The #reset-cells was listed as optional in the bindings for
qcom,sdm845-videocc. There's no reason for it to be optional. As per
Stephen [1]:
> We should update the binding to make it a required property. It
> doesn't make any sense why that property would be optional given
> that the hardware
4 matches
Mail list logo