RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mips: lantiq: Document Lantiq Xway DMA bindings

2021-01-16 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
(another late reply from me, sorry) > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg This is actually an older IP variant of what can be found in the Intel LGM SoCs. The dt-bindings are currently being upstreamed for that newer SoC in [0]. Based on "DOs and DON’Ts for designing and writing Devicetree

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mips: lantiq: Document Lantiq Xway DMA bindings

2021-01-13 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:18:03AM +0100, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski wrote: > Document the Lantiq Xway SoC DMA Controller DT bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski > --- > .../bindings/mips/lantiq/lantiq,dma-xway.yaml | 32 +++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mips: lantiq: Document Lantiq Xway DMA bindings

2021-01-11 Thread Rob Herring
On Sun, 03 Jan 2021 11:18:03 +0100, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski wrote: > Document the Lantiq Xway SoC DMA Controller DT bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski > --- > .../bindings/mips/lantiq/lantiq,dma-xway.yaml | 32 +++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > create

[PATCH] dt-bindings: mips: lantiq: Document Lantiq Xway DMA bindings

2021-01-03 Thread Aleksander Jan Bajkowski
Document the Lantiq Xway SoC DMA Controller DT bindings. Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski --- .../bindings/mips/lantiq/lantiq,dma-xway.yaml | 32 +++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/lantiq/lantiq,dma-xway.yaml