Jiang Liu wrote on 02/03/16 13:50:
I spoke too soon, without removing and re-inserting the eata module
before any filesystems on disks attached to the DPT controller were
mounted, I'd get the following messages, similar to ones previously
reported:
sd 0:0:6:0: tag#0 abort, mbox 1.
EATA0:
Jiang Liu wrote on 02/03/16 13:50:
I spoke too soon, without removing and re-inserting the eata module
before any filesystems on disks attached to the DPT controller were
mounted, I'd get the following messages, similar to ones previously
reported:
sd 0:0:6:0: tag#0 abort, mbox 1.
EATA0:
On 2016/3/2 5:36, Arthur Marsh wrote:
>
>
> Arthur Marsh wrote on 02/03/16 03:57:
>>
>>
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote on 01/03/16 17:22:
>>> Hi Jiang.
>>>
>>> I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
>>>
>>> Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
On 2016/3/2 5:36, Arthur Marsh wrote:
>
>
> Arthur Marsh wrote on 02/03/16 03:57:
>>
>>
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote on 01/03/16 17:22:
>>> Hi Jiang.
>>>
>>> I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
>>>
>>> Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
Arthur Marsh wrote on 02/03/16 03:57:
Christoph Hellwig wrote on 01/03/16 17:22:
Hi Jiang.
I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
of the patch?
I applied Jiang Liu's patch of 1st March 2016 to
Arthur Marsh wrote on 02/03/16 03:57:
Christoph Hellwig wrote on 01/03/16 17:22:
Hi Jiang.
I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
of the patch?
I applied Jiang Liu's patch of 1st March 2016 to
Christoph Hellwig wrote on 01/03/16 17:22:
Hi Jiang.
I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
of the patch?
I applied Jiang Liu's patch of 1st March 2016 to a clean kernel
4.5.0-rc6 source,
Christoph Hellwig wrote on 01/03/16 17:22:
Hi Jiang.
I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
of the patch?
I applied Jiang Liu's patch of 1st March 2016 to a clean kernel
4.5.0-rc6 source,
Hi Jiang.
I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
of the patch?
Hi Jiang.
I'd love to see this patch in and abuse of the old PCI API gone.
Did you resolve the problems Arthur saw with the previous iteratons
of the patch?
Hi Jiang,
[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160229]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
Hi Jiang,
[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160229]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
Hi Jiang,
[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160229]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
Hi Jiang,
[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc6 next-20160229]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
Previously the eata driver just grabs and accesses eata PCI devices
without implementing a PCI device driver, that causes troubles with
latest IRQ related
Commit 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and
pcibios_free_irq()") changes the way to allocate PCI legacy IRQ
for PCI
Previously the eata driver just grabs and accesses eata PCI devices
without implementing a PCI device driver, that causes troubles with
latest IRQ related
Commit 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and
pcibios_free_irq()") changes the way to allocate PCI legacy IRQ
for PCI
16 matches
Mail list logo
