於 二，2013-05-14 於 08:16 +0100，Matt Fleming 提到：
> On 05/14/2013 05:36 AM, joeyli wrote:
> > I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
> > zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.
> >
> > Did this patch move to other branch?
>
> It appears
On 05/14/2013 05:36 AM, joeyli wrote:
> I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
> zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.
>
> Did this patch move to other branch?
It appears I dropped this patch when doing the rebase against -rc1.
On 05/14/2013 05:36 AM, joeyli wrote:
I found the [PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
zero lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.
Did this patch move to other branch?
It appears I dropped this patch when doing the rebase against -rc1. I'm
於 二，2013-05-14 於 08:16 +0100，Matt Fleming 提到：
On 05/14/2013 05:36 AM, joeyli wrote:
I found the [PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
zero lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.
Did this patch move to other branch?
It appears I dropped
Hi Matt,
於 一，2013-05-13 於 20:21 +0100，Matt Fleming 提到：
> On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
> > Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
> > EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
> > avoid confusion. After refactoring in
On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
> Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
> EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
> avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other
> places where the translation may be
On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other
places where the translation may be
Hi Matt,
於 一，2013-05-13 於 20:21 +0100，Matt Fleming 提到：
On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is
Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other
places where the translation may be unnecessary.
So move the translation to efivarfs
Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other
places where the translation may be unnecessary.
So move the translation to efivarfs
10 matches
Mail list logo
