At 8/14/2012 01:21 PM, Christof Meerwald wrote:
Hi Paton,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 06:37:06PM -0700, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
[...]
> My first concern is about code clarity. Using a custom event to
> delete an event type (either EPOLLIN or EPOLLOUT) from an epoll item
> requires that functionality
Hi Paton,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 06:37:06PM -0700, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
[...]
> My first concern is about code clarity. Using a custom event to
> delete an event type (either EPOLLIN or EPOLLOUT) from an epoll item
> requires that functionality to be split across two areas of code:
> the code
Hi Paton,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 06:37:06PM -0700, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
[...]
My first concern is about code clarity. Using a custom event to
delete an event type (either EPOLLIN or EPOLLOUT) from an epoll item
requires that functionality to be split across two areas of code:
the code that
At 8/14/2012 01:21 PM, Christof Meerwald wrote:
Hi Paton,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 06:37:06PM -0700, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
[...]
My first concern is about code clarity. Using a custom event to
delete an event type (either EPOLLIN or EPOLLOUT) from an epoll item
requires that functionality to
Christof,
I notice that Windows (via I/O Completion Ports) and both BSD and
OS/X (via kqueue) all appear to have support for both of the concepts
we have been discussing: 1) the ability to disable epoll items, and
2) the ability to send custom events. This suggests that either
solution may
Christof,
I notice that Windows (via I/O Completion Ports) and both BSD and
OS/X (via kqueue) all appear to have support for both of the concepts
we have been discussing: 1) the ability to disable epoll items, and
2) the ability to send custom events. This suggests that either
solution may
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:43:06PM -0700, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
> At 6/19/2012 11:17 AM, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> >But, taking one step back - wouldn't an alternative approach be to add
> >some mechanism to allow a thread to post a user-event for an fd? So in
> >delete_epoll_item you would post
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:43:06PM -0700, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
At 6/19/2012 11:17 AM, Christof Meerwald wrote:
But, taking one step back - wouldn't an alternative approach be to add
some mechanism to allow a thread to post a user-event for an fd? So in
delete_epoll_item you would post a user
8 matches
Mail list logo