On 2021/4/9 9:47, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:41:57AM +0800, yebin wrote:
If call ext4_ext_insert_extent failed but new extent already inserted, we just
update "ex->ee_len = orig_ex.ee_len", this will lead to extent overlap, then
cause bug on when cache extent.
How did th
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:41:57AM +0800, yebin wrote:
> > > If call ext4_ext_insert_extent failed but new extent already inserted, we
> > > just
> > > update "ex->ee_len = orig_ex.ee_len", this will lead to extent overlap,
> > > then
> > > cause bug on when cache extent.
> > How did this happen
On 2021/4/6 11:34, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:29:25AM +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
We got follow bug_on:
[130747.323114] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:762!
[130747.323117] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
..
[130747.334329] Call trace:
[130747.334553] ext4_es_
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:29:25AM +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
> We got follow bug_on:
> [130747.323114] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:762!
> [130747.323117] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> ..
> [130747.334329] Call trace:
> [130747.334553] ext4_es_cache_extent+0x150/0x168 [ext4]
>
We got follow bug_on:
[130747.323114] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:762!
[130747.323117] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
..
[130747.334329] Call trace:
[130747.334553] ext4_es_cache_extent+0x150/0x168 [ext4]
[130747.334975] ext4_cache_extents+0x64/0xe8 [ext4]
[130747.335368]
5 matches
Mail list logo