On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:33 PM Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:32:06PM -0800, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> >
> > After [2]:
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
>
> Any chance that in the future this might become:
>
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit.py run
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:32:06PM -0800, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> As of [1], we no longer want EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS and others to `select`
> their deps. This means it can get harder to get all the right things
> selected as we gain more tests w/ more deps over time.
>
> This patch (and [2]) proposes w
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:33 PM Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:32:06PM -0800, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> >
> > After [2]:
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
>
> Any chance that in the future this might become:
>
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit.py run
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:32:06PM -0800, Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> After [2]:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
Any chance that in the future this might become:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4
Or better yet, syntactic sugar like:
$ ./to
As of [1], we no longer want EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS and others to `select`
their deps. This means it can get harder to get all the right things
selected as we gain more tests w/ more deps over time.
This patch (and [2]) proposes we store kunitconfig fragments in-tree to
represent sets of tests. (N.B. ri
5 matches
Mail list logo