On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 03:25:47PM +0530, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 04:29:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2020/8/14 16:05, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > >If the sbi->ckpt->next_free_nid is not NAT block aligned and if there
> > >are free nids in that NAT block between the star
On 2020/8/18 17:55, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 04:29:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2020/8/14 16:05, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
If the sbi->ckpt->next_free_nid is not NAT block aligned and if there
are free nids in that NAT block between the start of the block and
next_free_nid,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 04:29:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/8/14 16:05, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> >If the sbi->ckpt->next_free_nid is not NAT block aligned and if there
> >are free nids in that NAT block between the start of the block and
> >next_free_nid, then those free nids will not be sca
On 2020/8/14 16:05, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
If the sbi->ckpt->next_free_nid is not NAT block aligned and if there
are free nids in that NAT block between the start of the block and
next_free_nid, then those free nids will not be scanned in scan_nat_page().
This results into mismatch between nm_i->
If the sbi->ckpt->next_free_nid is not NAT block aligned and if there
are free nids in that NAT block between the start of the block and
next_free_nid, then those free nids will not be scanned in scan_nat_page().
This results into mismatch between nm_i->available_nids and the sum of
nm_i->free_nid_
5 matches
Mail list logo
