Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
And the following allows PARAVIRT kernels to boot on x86_64.
Fill in missing pagetable manipulation
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
And the following allows PARAVIRT kernels to boot on x86_64.
Fill in missing pagetable manipulation
* Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
> > preventing the whole tree from booting.
> >
>
> And the following allows PARAVIRT kernels to boot on x86_64.
> Fill in missing pagetable manipulation entries in pv_mmu_ops
* Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
And the following allows PARAVIRT kernels to boot on x86_64.
Fill in missing pagetable manipulation entries in pv_mmu_ops
for
Eduardo Pereira Habkost wrote:
+ .pud_clear = native_pud_clear,
On the patches I will send, pud_clear() and pgd_clear() aren't present
on pv_mmu_ops and are implemented using set_pud() and set_pgd().
Actually, I changed my mind on that. pud_clear needs special handling
with
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:19:09PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
> > to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
> > some more
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:19:09PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps
Eduardo Pereira Habkost wrote:
+ .pud_clear = native_pud_clear,
On the patches I will send, pud_clear() and pgd_clear() aren't present
on pv_mmu_ops and are implemented using set_pud() and set_pgd().
Actually, I changed my mind on that. pud_clear needs special handling
with
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps are needed.
The first fix is not even
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
> to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
> some more small steps are needed.
>
> The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT,
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps are needed.
The first fix is not even
11 matches
Mail list logo
