Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 27 January 2008 12:21:56 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Scenario: Process A keeps the character device file of node N open.
>> N is being unplugged. File /dev/fwN won't be destroyed as long as A
>> doesn't close it. Now, process B opens /dev/fwN as well. Previously
On Sunday 27 January 2008 12:21:56 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> Scenario: Process A keeps the character device file of node N open.
> N is being unplugged. File /dev/fwN won't be destroyed as long as A
> doesn't close it. Now, process B opens /dev/fwN as well. Previously
> it would succeed but
On Sunday 27 January 2008 12:21:56 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
Scenario: Process A keeps the character device file of node N open.
N is being unplugged. File /dev/fwN won't be destroyed as long as A
doesn't close it. Now, process B opens /dev/fwN as well. Previously
it would succeed but be
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 27 January 2008 12:21:56 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
Scenario: Process A keeps the character device file of node N open.
N is being unplugged. File /dev/fwN won't be destroyed as long as A
doesn't close it. Now, process B opens /dev/fwN as well. Previously
it
Scenario: Process A keeps the character device file of node N open.
N is being unplugged. File /dev/fwN won't be destroyed as long as A
doesn't close it. Now, process B opens /dev/fwN as well. Previously
it would succeed but be unable to do any IO on it of course. With this
patch, process B's
Scenario: Process A keeps the character device file of node N open.
N is being unplugged. File /dev/fwN won't be destroyed as long as A
doesn't close it. Now, process B opens /dev/fwN as well. Previously
it would succeed but be unable to do any IO on it of course. With this
patch, process B's
6 matches
Mail list logo