On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:44:34AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:37:11AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it? If you want it
> > > sometime in the
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:44:34AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:37:11AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it? If you want it
> > > sometime in the
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:37:11AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it? If you want it
> > sometime in the future, great, we can revert the deletion then, but
> > keeping it around for
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:37:11AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it? If you want it
> > sometime in the future, great, we can revert the deletion then, but
> > keeping it around for
On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > >
On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 13:22 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused
> > internal
> >
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 13:22 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused
> > internal
> > flag, which simplifies the
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> > flag,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> > flag, which simplifies the logic
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
>
This API was
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
>
This API was implemented to reduce the
As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
Reported-by: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
Reported-by: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
14 matches
Mail list logo