Re: [PATCH] fix amd64-agp aperture validation

2007-03-29 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 08:58:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > Under CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM, assuming that a !pfn_valid() implies all > subsequent pfn-s are also invalid is wrong. Thus replace this by > explicitly checking against the E820 map. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ac

Re: [patches] [PATCH] fix amd64-agp aperture validation

2007-03-29 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 29 March 2007 09:58, Jan Beulich wrote: > Under CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM, assuming that a !pfn_valid() implies all > subsequent pfn-s are also invalid is wrong. Thus replace this by > explicitly checking against the E820 map. Applied thanks. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

[PATCH] fix amd64-agp aperture validation

2007-03-28 Thread Jan Beulich
Under CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM, assuming that a !pfn_valid() implies all subsequent pfn-s are also invalid is wrong. Thus replace this by explicitly checking against the E820 map. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Mark Langsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5/arch/i386