Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:31:18AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> Please verify, this patch was not yet tested
>> ---
>> Convert list_for_each_rcu() to list_for_each_entry_rcu()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> NACK. This patch doesn't build. You
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:31:18AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Please verify, this patch was not yet tested
> ---
> Convert list_for_each_rcu() to list_for_each_entry_rcu()
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NACK. This patch doesn't build. You have extra cur in the conversion.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:31:18AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
Please verify, this patch was not yet tested
---
Convert list_for_each_rcu() to list_for_each_entry_rcu()
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NACK. This patch doesn't build. You have extra cur in the conversion.
Right
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:31:18AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
Please verify, this patch was not yet tested
---
Convert list_for_each_rcu() to list_for_each_entry_rcu()
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NACK. This patch doesn't build. You have extra cur in
Please verify, this patch was not yet tested
---
Convert list_for_each_rcu() to list_for_each_entry_rcu()
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index dd0fcfc..0c4dd13 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3127,6
Please verify, this patch was not yet tested
---
Convert list_for_each_rcu() to list_for_each_entry_rcu()
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index dd0fcfc..0c4dd13 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3127,6
6 matches
Mail list logo