On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 02:02:57PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Yes. If you are looking for a cleanup task, you can
> apply relevant patches from my series, starting with:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9481237/
> (Leave the xfs patch [11/11] out)
>
> But besides verifying that patches
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 02:02:57PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Yes. If you are looking for a cleanup task, you can
> apply relevant patches from my series, starting with:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9481237/
> (Leave the xfs patch [11/11] out)
>
> But besides verifying that patches
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:57 PM Phillip Potter wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 08:30:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > > > Remove switch statement from
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:57 PM Phillip Potter wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 08:30:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > > > Remove switch statement from
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 08:30:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > > header and replace
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 08:30:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > > header and replace
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> > is equal to DT_x, so
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> > is equal to DT_x, so
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 03:26:37PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> > is equal to
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 03:26:37PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> > is equal to
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
> us the correct
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
> us the correct
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. It is expected that for *nix compatibility
reasons, the
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. It is expected that for *nix compatibility
reasons, the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:33:05AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> They are. BSD folks had (sanely, IMO) put the 'type' bits of st_mode
> into directory entry verbatim. Again, "symbolic constant" != "can be
> expected to change"... If, e.g., some port decides to change S_IFIFO,
> they'll have no end of
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:33:05AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> They are. BSD folks had (sanely, IMO) put the 'type' bits of st_mode
> into directory entry verbatim. Again, "symbolic constant" != "can be
> expected to change"... If, e.g., some port decides to change S_IFIFO,
> they'll have no end of
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:11:47AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Phillip Potter
> > Sent: 17 October 2018 11:08
> >
> > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> > is equal to DT_x, so in
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:11:47AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Phillip Potter
> > Sent: 17 October 2018 11:08
> >
> > Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> > header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> > is equal to DT_x, so in
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. This is verified at compile-time with
BUILD_BUG_ON macro
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. This is verified at compile-time with
BUILD_BUG_ON macro
From: Phillip Potter
> Sent: 17 October 2018 11:08
>
> Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
> us the correct file type.
From: Phillip Potter
> Sent: 17 October 2018 11:08
>
> Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
> header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
> is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
> us the correct file type.
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. For invalid cases, upper layer validation
catches this
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. For invalid cases, upper layer validation
catches this
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. For invalid cases, upper layer validation
catches this
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. For invalid cases, upper layer validation
catches this
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. For invalid cases, upper layer validation
catches this
Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h
header and replace with simple assignment. For each case, S_IFx >> 12
is equal to DT_x, so in valid cases (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 should give
us the correct file type. For invalid cases, upper layer validation
catches this
28 matches
Mail list logo
