Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

2017-01-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:31:42AM -0800, ccrome wrote: > The subject should be > > [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value > > Correct? Yes. > Should I re-submit? No, it's fine - if I'm sending one of those mails it'll be fine as I've actually seen the mail to reply

Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

2017-01-04 Thread ccrome
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:22:57AM -0800, Caleb Crome wrote: > > From: Caleb Crome > > > > The fsl_ssi fifo watermark is by default set to 2 free spaces (i.e. > > activate DMA on FIFO when only 2 spaces are left.) This means the > > Please s

Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

2017-01-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:22:57AM -0800, Caleb Crome wrote: > From: Caleb Crome > > The fsl_ssi fifo watermark is by default set to 2 free spaces (i.e. > activate DMA on FIFO when only 2 spaces are left.) This means the Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the sub

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

2017-01-03 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Caleb Crome wrote: > From: Caleb Crome > > The fsl_ssi fifo watermark is by default set to 2 free spaces (i.e. > activate DMA on FIFO when only 2 spaces are left.) This means the > DMA must service the fifo within 2 audio samples, which is just not > enough time

[PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

2017-01-03 Thread Caleb Crome
From: Caleb Crome The fsl_ssi fifo watermark is by default set to 2 free spaces (i.e. activate DMA on FIFO when only 2 spaces are left.) This means the DMA must service the fifo within 2 audio samples, which is just not enough time for many use cases with high data rate. In many configurations