On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:54:58 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:45:39AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:51:21AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:04:06 +0100
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks fo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:45:39AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:51:21AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:04:06 +0100
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for this.
> > >
> > > Should I also queue these up for 4.9 and 4.14 which do not
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:51:21AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:04:06 +0100
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > Should I also queue these up for 4.9 and 4.14 which do not have these
> > commits in them either (but somehow do not show the problem, y
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:04:06 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Thanks for this.
>
> Should I also queue these up for 4.9 and 4.14 which do not have these
> commits in them either (but somehow do not show the problem, yet)?
This bothers me. I want to know exactly why this is a problem.
That sai
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:00:57PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:06:39 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Strange, that when I applied this to the latest kernel on a my build
> > system (binutils 2.35), it still created all the necessary mcount
> > locations??
>
> I know
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:06:39 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Strange, that when I applied this to the latest kernel on a my build
> system (binutils 2.35), it still created all the necessary mcount
> locations??
I know why it worked. If you are using the latest gcc on the latest
mainline, it will
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:05:04 -0600
Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:44:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
> >
> > Starting with binutils 2.36, sections were being removed if they had weak
> > functions that were optimized out. Unfortunately,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:44:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> Starting with binutils 2.36, sections were being removed if they had weak
> functions that were optimized out. Unfortunately, these weak functions would
> leave references to mcount/fentry calls,
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
Starting with binutils 2.36, sections were being removed if they had weak
functions that were optimized out. Unfortunately, these weak functions would
leave references to mcount/fentry calls, that would make recordmcount fail
to find the symbol that matched the cal
9 matches
Mail list logo
