Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use

On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 11:51:34AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > Masami Hiramatsu reported a memory leak in register_ftrace_direct() where > if the number of new entries are added is large enough to cause two > allocations in the loop: > > for (i = 0;

Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use

On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:51:34 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > Masami Hiramatsu reported a memory leak in register_ftrace_direct() where > if the number of new entries are added is large enough to cause two > allocations in the loop: > > for (i = 0; i <

Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use

Masami and Jiri, This patch made it through all my tests. If I can get an Acked-by by Sunday, I'll include it in my push to Linus (I have a couple of other fixes to send him). -- Steve On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:51:34 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > Masami Hi

[PATCH] ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" Masami Hiramatsu reported a memory leak in register_ftrace_direct() where if the number of new entries are added is large enough to cause two allocations in the loop: for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { hlist_for_each_entry(entry, &hash->buckets[i