On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:48 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:33:37PM +, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >
> > On 18/12/2020 17:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:33 AM Jon Hunter wrote:
> > >>
> > >> However, if you are saying that this is a problem/bug
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:33:37PM +, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2020 17:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:33 AM Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> However, if you are saying that this is a problem/bug with our builders,
> >> then of course we will have to get this fixed.
On 18/12/2020 17:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:33 AM Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> However, if you are saying that this is a problem/bug with our builders,
>> then of course we will have to get this fixed.
>
> This seems to be a package dependency problem with the gcc plugins
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:33 AM Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> However, if you are saying that this is a problem/bug with our builders,
> then of course we will have to get this fixed.
This seems to be a package dependency problem with the gcc plugins -
they clearly want libgmp, but apparently the
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:42:51AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:33 AM Jon Hunter wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18/12/2020 15:12, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18/12/2020 15:09, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 18.12.2020 16:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > >>> On
On 18/12/2020 15:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
...
>> However, if you are saying that this is a problem/bug with our builders,
>> then of course we will have to get this fixed.
>>
>
>
> Yes, please do so.
>
>
> Kconfig evaluates $(CC) capabilities, and
> hides CONFIG options it cannot
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:33 AM Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>
> On 18/12/2020 15:12, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >
> > On 18/12/2020 15:09, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>
> >> On 18.12.2020 16:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>> On 18/12/2020 10:05, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 18.12.2020 10:43, Masahiro Yamada
On 18/12/2020 15:12, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2020 15:09, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>
>> On 18.12.2020 16:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 18/12/2020 10:05, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 18.12.2020 10:43, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marek Szyprowski
>
On 18/12/2020 15:09, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> On 18.12.2020 16:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 18/12/2020 10:05, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> On 18.12.2020 10:43, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> On 03.12.2020 13:57, Masahiro Yamada
On 18.12.2020 16:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 18/12/2020 10:05, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 18.12.2020 10:43, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marek Szyprowski
>>> wrote:
On 03.12.2020 13:57, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Linus pointed out a third of the time in
On 18/12/2020 10:05, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 18.12.2020 10:43, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marek Szyprowski
>> wrote:
>>> On 03.12.2020 13:57, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
from the
On 18.12.2020 10:43, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marek Szyprowski
> wrote:
>> On 03.12.2020 13:57, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
>>> from the single invocation of cc1plus in scripts/gcc-plugin.sh [1],
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 03.12.2020 13:57, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
> > from the single invocation of cc1plus in scripts/gcc-plugin.sh [1],
> > and directly testing
Hi,
On 03.12.2020 13:57, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
> from the single invocation of cc1plus in scripts/gcc-plugin.sh [1],
> and directly testing plugin-version.h for existence cuts down the
> overhead a lot. [2]
>
> This commit
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 21:57:00 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
> from the single invocation of cc1plus in scripts/gcc-plugin.sh [1],
> and directly testing plugin-version.h for existence cuts down the
> overhead a lot. [2]
>
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 09:57:00PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
> from the single invocation of cc1plus in scripts/gcc-plugin.sh [1],
> and directly testing plugin-version.h for existence cuts down the
> overhead a lot. [2]
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:03 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Checking the existence of plugin-version.h is still needed to ensure
> the plugin-dev package is installed. The test code is now small enough
> to be embedded in scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig.
Ack. I think the "plugin" directory name should
Linus pointed out a third of the time in the Kconfig parse stage comes
from the single invocation of cc1plus in scripts/gcc-plugin.sh [1],
and directly testing plugin-version.h for existence cuts down the
overhead a lot. [2]
This commit takes one step further to kill the build test entirely.
The
18 matches
Mail list logo
