On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 04:23:42PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:41:07PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Some systems are not allowing usernames prefixed with a number now, this
> > test however relies on the assumption that you can end up with usernames
> > of such
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 04:23:42PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:41:07PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Some systems are not allowing usernames prefixed with a number now, this
> > test however relies on the assumption that you can end up with usernames
> > of such
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:41:07PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Some systems are not allowing usernames prefixed with a number now, this
> test however relies on the assumption that you can end up with usernames
> of such type, given the purpose of the test is to ensure that xfs_quota
> can
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:41:07PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Some systems are not allowing usernames prefixed with a number now, this
> test however relies on the assumption that you can end up with usernames
> of such type, given the purpose of the test is to ensure that xfs_quota
> can
Some systems are not allowing usernames prefixed with a number now, this
test however relies on the assumption that you can end up with usernames
of such type, given the purpose of the test is to ensure that xfs_quota
can differentiate between UIDs and names beginning with numbers.
systemd >= 232
Some systems are not allowing usernames prefixed with a number now, this
test however relies on the assumption that you can end up with usernames
of such type, given the purpose of the test is to ensure that xfs_quota
can differentiate between UIDs and names beginning with numbers.
systemd >= 232
6 matches
Mail list logo