On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 23:36:22 +0200
Morten Helgesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /*
> > Problems to take into account are:
> > -1- Interrupts that empty part of the buffer.
> -> -2- page faults on the access to userspace.
> +> -2- Page faults on access to userspace.
#2 no l
Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:39:05 +0200
Morten Helgesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
[...snip...]
@@ -75,11 +64,11 @@
if (! (port->flags & ASYNC_INITIALIZED)) return;
/* Take a lock on the serial tranmit buffer! */
- LOCKIT;
+ mutex_lo
Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:39:05 +0200
Morten Helgesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
[...snip...]
@@ -75,11 +64,11 @@
if (! (port->flags & ASYNC_INITIALIZED)) return;
/* Take a lock on the serial tranmit buffer! */
- LOCKIT;
+ mutex_lo
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:39:05 +0200
Morten Helgesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>
> [...snip...]
> > @@ -75,11 +64,11 @@
> > if (! (port->flags & ASYNC_INITIALIZED)) return;
> >
> > /* Take a lock on the serial tranmit buffer! */
> > - LOCKIT;
> > + mutex_lock(& port
Alan Cox wrote:
[...snip...]
@@ -75,11 +64,11 @@
if (! (port->flags & ASYNC_INITIALIZED)) return;
/* Take a lock on the serial tranmit buffer! */
- LOCKIT;
+ mutex_lock(& port->port_write_mutex);
^ Contains additional whitespace.
if (port->xmit_cnt >= SERI
We've been using the 'new locking' for a long time now so it seems
pointless keeping the old one around. Remove it and undo the macros it
uses back into real code for readability. Remove the bogus 'no termios
change' checks.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -u --new-file --exclude
6 matches
Mail list logo
