Hi Shameer,
On 2021-01-22 09:21, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
Hi Marc,
[...]
I find this pretty complicated, and the I'd like to avoid injecting
the PCI
MSI-vs-MSI-X concept in something that is supposed to be bus-agnostic.
Agree. That’s mainly because I was very skeptical(TBH, very
x...@openeuler.org;
> Zengtao (B) ; Wangzhou (B)
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Make sure early activation of all PCI MSIs
>
> Hi Shameer,
>
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:02:47 +,
> Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> >
> > We currently do early activation of MSI irqs for
Hi Shameer,
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:02:47 +,
Shameer Kolothum wrote:
>
> We currently do early activation of MSI irqs for PCI/MSI based on
> the MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY flag. Though this activates all the
> allocated MSIs in the case of MSI-X, it only does so for the
> base irq in the case
We currently do early activation of MSI irqs for PCI/MSI based on
the MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY flag. Though this activates all the
allocated MSIs in the case of MSI-X, it only does so for the
base irq in the case of MSI. This is because, for MSI, there
is only one msi_desc entry for all the 32 irqs
4 matches
Mail list logo