On 24.07.2012 16:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index d18068a..51bc232 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -147,13 +147,13
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > But why would you do that? Both the "gpiochip" and its DT representation
> > attempt to represent the hardware structure. If they don't match, then
> > I'd assume one of them is wrong ;-)
>
> Well, have a look at what's currently there in drivers/gpi
Hi Arnd,
On 24.07.2012 14:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> (Cc: Arnd)
>>
>> On 22.07.2012 19:10, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is called for each chip when a GPIO is looked up.
>>> When registering several chips off the same DT node (with dif
On Monday 23 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote:
> (Cc: Arnd)
>
> On 22.07.2012 19:10, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > of_gpio_simple_xlate() is called for each chip when a GPIO is looked up.
> > When registering several chips off the same DT node (with different pin
> > offsets) however, the lookup fails as the
(Cc: Arnd)
On 22.07.2012 19:10, Daniel Mack wrote:
> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is called for each chip when a GPIO is looked up.
> When registering several chips off the same DT node (with different pin
> offsets) however, the lookup fails as the GPIO number passed in to
> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is l
of_gpio_simple_xlate() is called for each chip when a GPIO is looked up.
When registering several chips off the same DT node (with different pin
offsets) however, the lookup fails as the GPIO number passed in to
of_gpio_simple_xlate() is likely higher than the chip's ->ngpio value.
Fix that by tak
6 matches
Mail list logo
