Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: nouveau: Use list_for_each_entry_from_reverse

On 27 March 2018 at 19:11, Arushi Singhal wrote: > It's better to use "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" for iterating list > than "for loop" as it makes the code more clear to read. > This patch replace "for loop" with "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" > and

Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: nouveau: Use list_for_each_entry_from_reverse

On 27 March 2018 at 19:11, Arushi Singhal wrote: > It's better to use "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" for iterating list > than "for loop" as it makes the code more clear to read. > This patch replace "for loop" with "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" > and remove "cstate" variable as it is

[PATCH] gpu: drm: nouveau: Use list_for_each_entry_from_reverse

It's better to use "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" for iterating list than "for loop" as it makes the code more clear to read. This patch replace "for loop" with "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" and remove "cstate" variable as it is redundant in the code. Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal

[PATCH] gpu: drm: nouveau: Use list_for_each_entry_from_reverse

It's better to use "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" for iterating list than "for loop" as it makes the code more clear to read. This patch replace "for loop" with "list_for_each_entry_from_reverse" and remove "cstate" variable as it is redundant in the code. Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal ---