Arnd,
> I think Martin is still waiting for a fixed version of the patch, as
> the proposed patch from March 12 only solves the immediate symptom,
> but not the underlying problem of the CommandList structure being
> marked as unaligned. If it gets fixed, the new version should work on
> all
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:28 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 3/24/21 7:37 PM, don.br...@microchip.com wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Don Brace
> >
> > Thanks for your patch and extra effort.
>
> Apologies for being so persistent, but has this patch been queued anywhere?
>
> This should be
Hi!
On 3/24/21 7:37 PM, don.br...@microchip.com wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergei Trofimovich [mailto:sly...@gentoo.org]
> Subject: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
>
> The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine w
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:28:31 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Sergei!
>
> On 3/12/21 11:27 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine
> > with RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P600:
> >
> >
-Original Message-
From: Sergei Trofimovich [mailto:sly...@gentoo.org]
Subject: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine with RAID
bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P600:
kernel
Hello!
On 3/12/21 11:27 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine
> with RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P600:
>
> kernel unaligned access to 0xe00105dd8b95, ip=0xa00100b87551
> kernel unaligned
-Original Message-
From: David Laight [mailto:david.lai...@aculab.com]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
From: Martin K. Petersen
> Sent: 17 March 2021 02:26
>
> Arnd,
>
> > Actually that still feels wrong: the annotation of the struct is
Hi Sergei!
On 3/12/21 11:27 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine
> with RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P600:
>
> kernel unaligned access to 0xe00105dd8b95, ip=0xa00100b87551
> kernel
From: Martin K. Petersen
> Sent: 17 March 2021 02:26
>
> Arnd,
>
> > Actually that still feels wrong: the annotation of the struct is to
> > pack every member, which causes the access to be done in byte units on
> > architectures that do not have hardware unaligned load/store
> > instructions,
Arnd,
> Actually that still feels wrong: the annotation of the struct is to
> pack every member, which causes the access to be done in byte units on
> architectures that do not have hardware unaligned load/store
> instructions, at least for things like atomic_read() that does not go
> through a
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:12 PM wrote:
> drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h | 14 +-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h b/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h index
> d126bb877250..617bdae9a7de 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h
> +++
-Original Message-
From: Sergei Trofimovich [mailto:sly...@gentoo.org]
Subject: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine with RAID
bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P600:
kernel
The failure initially observed as boot failure on rx3600 ia64 machine
with RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P600:
kernel unaligned access to 0xe00105dd8b95, ip=0xa00100b87551
kernel unaligned access to 0xe00105dd8e95, ip=0xa00100b87551
hpsa
13 matches
Mail list logo
