On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Bill Irwin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > But I do think a second reason to do this is to make hugetlbfs behave
> > like a normal fs -- that is read(), write(), etc. work on files in the
> > mountpoint. But that is simply my o
On 20.07.2007 [14:47:31 +1000], Nick Piggin wrote:
> Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >On 19.07.2007 [09:58:50 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >+}
> >+
> >+of
(sorry if this is a resend... something bad seems to have happened to me)
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This code doesn't have all the ghastly tricks which we deploy to handle
concurrent truncate.
Do I need to ? Baaahh!!
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This code doesn't have all the ghastly tricks which we deploy to handle
concurrent truncate.
Do I need to ? Baaahh!! I don't want to deal with them.
Nick, can you think of any serious con
Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 19.07.2007 [09:58:50 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ }
+
+ offset += ret;
+ retval += ret;
+ len -= ret;
+ index +
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:29 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> + }
> +
> + offset += ret;
> + retval += ret;
> + len -= ret;
> +
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ }
+
+ offset += ret;
+ retval += ret;
+ len -= ret;
+ index += offset >> HPAGE_SHIFT;
+ offset &= ~HPAGE_MAS
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> But I do think a second reason to do this is to make hugetlbfs behave
> like a normal fs -- that is read(), write(), etc. work on files in the
> mountpoint. But that is simply my opinion.
Mine as well.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe
On 19.07.2007 [09:58:50 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + offset += ret;
> > > > + retval += ret;
> > > > + len -= ret;
> > > > +
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + offset += ret;
> > > + retval += ret;
> > > + len -= ret;
> > > + index += offset >> HPAGE_SHIFT;
> > > + offset &= ~HPAGE_MASK;
> > > +
> > > +
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:23:33 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Here is the patch to support read() for hugetlbfs, needed to get
> > oprofile working on executables backed by largepages.
> >
> > If
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:23:33 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Here is the patch to support read() for hugetlbfs, needed to get
> oprofile working on executables backed by largepages.
>
> If you plan to consider Christoph Lameter's pagecache cleanup patches,
> I
Hi Andrew,
Here is the patch to support read() for hugetlbfs, needed to get
oprofile working on executables backed by largepages.
If you plan to consider Christoph Lameter's pagecache cleanup patches,
I will re-write this. Otherwise, please consider this for -mm.
Thanks,
Badari
Support for rea
13 matches
Mail list logo