Hi Lars and Jean,
Are you taking this patch further to take care about ACPI related stuff
submitted by Mika?
Thanks,
Srinivas
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 12:46 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Ok, looks like there are two main differences in the two implementations.
> > >
> > > 1) The ACPI one uses a
> > Ok, looks like there are two main differences in the two implementations.
> >
> > 1) The ACPI one uses a integer index and the DT one uses a string index to
> > lookup the device.
> >
> > The problem with the index lookup is that the order is binding specific. So
> > it might be different bet
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 03:45 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:27:36PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >>On 09/22/2014 12:45 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel H
On 09/22/2014 03:45 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:27:36PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 09/22/2014 12:45 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:27:36PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 12:45 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example each address
> >>corresponding to a differ
On 09/22/2014 12:45 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example each address
corresponding to a different internal register map page of the device.
So far drivers which need suppor
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example each address
> corresponding to a different internal register map page of the device.
> So far drivers which need support for this have handled this with a driver
>
On 09/21/2014 07:49 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
This raises the first question for me: Are the additional addresses
configurable? Sadly, I can't find good documentation for the adv7604.
Otherwise, if I know I have a adv7604 and know its addresses, this
information should go into the driver and not
> >This raises the first question for me: Are the additional addresses
> >configurable? Sadly, I can't find good documentation for the adv7604.
> >Otherwise, if I know I have a adv7604 and know its addresses, this
> >information should go into the driver and not the DT.
> >
>
> They are. The curr
On 09/20/2014 06:49 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example each address
corresponding to a different internal register map page of the device.
So far drivers which need support f
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example each address
> corresponding to a different internal register map page of the device.
> So far drivers which need support for this have handled this with a driver
>
Some I2C devices have multiple addresses assigned, for example each address
corresponding to a different internal register map page of the device.
So far drivers which need support for this have handled this with a driver
specific and non-generic implementation, e.g. passing the additional address
12 matches
Mail list logo