Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 5:28 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-05 03:43, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, >> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. >> According to the value of the

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 5:28 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-05 03:43, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, >> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. >> According to the value of the variable "size",

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

Hi Wenwen, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

Hi Wenwen, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-05 03:43, Wenwen Wang wrote: > In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, > which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. > According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to > various values. In contrast,

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-05 03:43, Wenwen Wang wrote: > In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, > which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. > According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to > various values. In contrast,

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

Hi Wenwen, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

Hi Wenwen, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the function

[PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the function

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 16:59, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 16:59, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 16:59, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 16:59, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 09:17, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: > In

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 07:28, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: > In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers:

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, >>> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-04 06:08, Wenwen Wang wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: >>> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, >>> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. >>>

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, >> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. >> According to the value of the

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: >> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, >> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. >> According to the value of the variable "size",

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: > In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, > which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. > According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to > various values. In contrast,

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote: > In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, > which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. > According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to > various values. In contrast,

[PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the function

[PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the function

[PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the function

[PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug

In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1, which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment. According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the function