Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

2021-03-18 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:28:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in > question, so it is redundant. Drop it. > > No functional impact. > > S

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

2021-03-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message > >

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

2021-03-10 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message > > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in > > q

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

2021-03-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in > question, so it is redundant. Drop it. > > No functional impact. > > Signed-off-b

[PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

2021-03-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in question, so it is redundant. Drop it. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c |2 -- 1 file