> > > > > + if (!known_i2c_address) {
> > > > > + dev_warn(&priv->pci_dev->dev,
> > > > > + "Accelerometer lis3lv02d i2c device is present
> > > > > "
> > > > > + "but its i2c address is unknown, skipping
> > > > > ...\n");
> > > >
> > >
On Jan 05 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 09:54:56 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > > > How about:
> > > > ---
> > > > From daa7571bbf337704332c0cfeec9b8fd5aeae596f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 09:54:56 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > How about:
> > > ---
> > > From daa7571bbf337704332c0cfeec9b8fd5aeae596f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Benjamin Tissoires
> > > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:26
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:00:30PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > From e362a0277fd1bd6112f258664d8831d9bc6b78da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Dmitry Torokhov
> > > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:33:43 -0800
> > > Subject: [
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:49:06PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > > > How about:
> > > > ---
> > > > From daa7571bbf337704332c0cfeec9b8fd5aeae596f Mon Sep 17 00:00:
> From e362a0277fd1bd6112f258664d8831d9bc6b78da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dmitry Torokhov
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:33:43 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c: do not enable fall back to Host Notify by default
>
> Falling back unconditionally to HostNotify as primary client's interrupt
> breaks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > From e362a0277fd1bd6112f258664d8831d9bc6b78da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Dmitry Torokhov
> > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:33:43 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] i2c: do not enable fall back to Host Notify by default
> >
> > Fallin
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > How about:
> > > ---
> > > From daa7571bbf337704332c0cfeec9b8fd5aeae596f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Benjamin Tissoires
> > > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:26:54 +01
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:59:37 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Some distributions blacklist i2c-i801.ko module... And
>
> Any particular reason for that?
At some point in time, the i2c-i801 driver caused problems on a few
systems. They
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > How about:
> > ---
> > From daa7571bbf337704332c0cfeec9b8fd5aeae596f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Benjamin Tissoires
> > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:26:54 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] I2C: add the source of the IRQ in struct i2c
> How about:
> ---
> From daa7571bbf337704332c0cfeec9b8fd5aeae596f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Benjamin Tissoires
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:26:54 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] I2C: add the source of the IRQ in struct i2c_client
>
> With commit 4d5538f5882a ("i2c: use an IRQ to report Host Notif
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 14:02:52 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > > > No. DT platforms won't have an issue: they don't change anything, and
> > > > > there will be a new /dev/freefall misc device for the platforms that
> > > >
> > > > And this
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 14:02:52 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 12:22:23 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:32:33 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrot
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 12:22:23 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:32:33 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:13:06 Benjamin Tissoires wrot
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:25:44 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With Michał we already discussed about it, see email
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 12:22:23 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:32:33 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:13:06 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrot
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:25:44 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > With Michał we already discussed about it, see emails. Basically you can
> > > enable/disable kernel modules at
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:32:33 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:13:06 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 10:05:22 Benjamin Tissoi
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:13:06 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 10:05:22 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 11:13:06 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2017 10:05:22 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 12:59:37 Dmitry Torokhov w
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > With Michał we already discussed about it, see emails. Basically you can
> > enable/disable kernel modules at compile time or blacklist at runtime
> > (or even chose what will be comp
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:06:41 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So 4d5538f5882a is breaking lis3lv02d driver...
>
> Apologies for that.
>
> I could easily fix this by adding a kernel API to know whether the
> provided irq is from Host Notify or
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 10:05:22 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 12:59:37 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> With Michał we already discussed about it, see emails. Basically you can
> enable/disable kernel modules at compile time or blacklist at runtime
> (or even chose what will be compiled into vmlinux and what as external
> .ko module). Some distr
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:02:52 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 02:51:01PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > i2c_new_device() with lis3lv02d for i801 i2c bus needs to be called
> > after initializing i2c-i801 bus driver.
> >
> > I have no idea how to do it (properly) outside of i2c-i80
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 10:13:38 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 03 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:29:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Jan 03 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yet another option: can we add a
On Jan 03 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:29:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jan 03 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> > > Yet another option: can we add a new flag to i2c_board_info controlling
> > > whether we want to enable/dis
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 10:05:22 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 12:59:37 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 21:24:18 Dmitry Toro
On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2017 12:59:37 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 21:24:18 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:05:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 03 January 2017 12:59:37 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 21:24:18 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:05:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 20:48:12 Dmitr
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:29:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jan 03 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > Yet another option: can we add a new flag to i2c_board_info controlling
> > whether we want to enable/disable wiring up host notify interrupt?
>
> That should be fairly
On Jan 03 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > > On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Ro
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2017 21:24:18 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:05:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 20:48:12 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:50:17PM +0100,
On Tuesday 03 January 2017 21:24:18 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:05:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 20:48:12 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitr
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:05:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2017 20:48:12 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:41AM +0100,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> "IIRC both dell-smo8800 and lis3lv02d represent one HW device (that
>> ST microelectronics accelerometer) but due to complicated HW
>> abstraction and layers on Dell laptops it is han
On Tuesday 03 January 2017 20:48:12 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Dec 29 2016 or thereabou
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 22:09:32 Micha
en Eisinger ;
> Gabriele Mazzotta ; Andy Lutomirski
> ; Limonciello, Mario ; Alex
> Hung ; Takashi Iwai ; linux-
> i...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-
> x...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on
On Tuesday 03 January 2017 19:38:43 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 22:09:32 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 14:47:19 Mich
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 December 2016 22:09:32 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 14:47:19 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36
On Tuesday 03 January 2017 10:06:41 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 December 2016 22:09:32 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > Also, just to make sure we do not overthink this, I understand that
> > > not every unit of the models from the white
On Dec 29 2016 or thereabouts, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 29 December 2016 22:09:32 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 14:47:19 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > > > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI
On Thursday 29 December 2016 22:09:32 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 December 2016 14:47:19 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > > > > > Latitude machines have ST
> On Thursday 29 December 2016 14:47:19 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > > > > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
> > > > > address 0x29. That
On Thursday 29 December 2016 14:47:19 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > > > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
> > > > address 0x29. That i2c addres
> On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
> > > address 0x29. That i2c address is not specified in DMI or ACPI, so
> > > runtime detection witho
On Thursday 29 December 2016 09:29:36 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
> > address 0x29. That i2c address is not specified in DMI or ACPI, so
> > runtime detection without whiteli
> Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell Latitude
> machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c address 0x29. That
> i2c address is not specified in DMI or ACPI, so runtime detection without
> whitelist which is below is not possible.
>
> Presence of that ST microel
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:03:02 +0100, Wolfram Sang said:
> > I have absolutely no idea how to you want to achieve calling that
> > i2c_new_device() registration
> > without kernel patches.
>
> Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices lists all supported methods.
> Method 4 is userspace instantiation.
I have absolutely no idea how to you want to achieve calling that
i2c_new_device() registration
without kernel patches.
Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices lists all supported methods.
Method 4 is userspace instantiation.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 02:51:01PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 27 December 2016 14:43:49 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
> > address 0x29. That
> > i2c address is not sp
On Wednesday 28 December 2016 08:55:18 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:41 AM, wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:15:30 +0200, Andy Shevchenko said:
> >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> >> > I have no idea how to do it (properly) outside of i2c-i801.c f
On Tuesday 27 December 2016 23:15:30 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 December 2016 14:43:49 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> >> > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accel
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:41 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:15:30 +0200, Andy Shevchenko said:
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> > I have no idea how to do it (properly) outside of i2c-i801.c file.
>>
>> I doubt we need a single line of code for this. See [1] and p
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:15:30 +0200, Andy Shevchenko said:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > I have no idea how to do it (properly) outside of i2c-i801.c file.
>
> I doubt we need a single line of code for this. See [1] and perhaps
> create an EFI variable with necessary upg
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 December 2016 14:43:49 Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
>> > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
>> > address 0x29. That
>> > i2c address is not specif
On Tuesday 27 December 2016 14:43:49 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell
> > Latitude machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c
> > address 0x29. That
> > i2c address is not specified in DMI or ACPI, so runtime detection
> > without
> > w
Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell Latitude
machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c address 0x29.
That
i2c address is not specified in DMI or ACPI, so runtime detection
without
whitelist which is below is not possible.
I'd think this should rather live
Dell platform team told us that some (DMI whitelisted) Dell Latitude
machines have ST microelectronics accelerometer at i2c address 0x29. That
i2c address is not specified in DMI or ACPI, so runtime detection without
whitelist which is below is not possible.
Presence of that ST microelectronics ac
60 matches
Mail list logo
