Re: [PATCH] i2c 2.5.5

2001-02-14 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 02.15 Alan Cox wrote: > > The rest are revision noise and incorrect reverts of include changes > > > #ifndef MODULE > > +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV > > extern int i2c_dev_init(void); > > Also reverting a cleanup > And I manually deleted the #endif /* X */ (kernel) vs #endif X

Re: [PATCH] i2c 2.5.5

2001-02-14 Thread Alan Cox
> @@ -71,4 +71,7 @@ >} > > +IMPORTANT: because of the use of inline functions, you *have* to use > +'-O' or some variation when you compile your program! > + Considered too obvious to restate > > -This sends a single byte to the device, at the place of the Rd/Wr bit. > +This sends a sing

[PATCH] i2c 2.5.5

2001-02-14 Thread J . A . Magallon
Hi, everyone... Kernel 2.4 looks like including the updated i2c package. But the diff automatic generator from i25 2.5.5 still gives this diffs against 2.4.1-ac13. Think about them for inclussion...(I do not know if some of them are not valid, like the change of for , but the #ifdefs CONFIG_