Sorry for butting in, but as a concerned user, let me add my two cents.
I have just about enough expertise in kernel to port this patch to
newer kernel versions. I have absolutely no idea on how to fix this
proper. And porting (in my case) is time-consuming and error-prone.
I wish this patch was
Sorry for butting in, but as a concerned user, let me add my two cents.
I have just about enough expertise in kernel to port this patch to
newer kernel versions. I have absolutely no idea on how to fix this
proper. And porting (in my case) is time-consuming and error-prone.
I wish this patch was
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 11:06 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:46:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 00:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
> > > wrote:
> > > > I don't know what to do with this.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:46:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 00:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
> > wrote:
> > > I don't know what to do with this. It seems like a lot of wishful
> > > thinking that in the best case
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:46:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 00:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know what to do with this. It seems like a lot of wishful
thinking that
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 11:06 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:46:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 00:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know what to do
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 00:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
> wrote:
> > I don't know what to do with this. It seems like a lot of wishful
> > thinking that in the best case would drag on for years. Even if we get
> > VGA arbitration out of Xorg,
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> I don't know what to do with this. It seems like a lot of wishful
> thinking that in the best case would drag on for years. Even if we get
> VGA arbitration out of Xorg, the bit about making the userspace VGA
> arbiter interface lie
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:38 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:30:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > Commit 81b5c7bc found that the
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:38 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:30:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know what to do with this. It seems like a lot of wishful
thinking that in the best case would drag on for years. Even if we get
VGA arbitration out of Xorg, the bit about making the userspace VGA
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 00:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know what to do with this. It seems like a lot of wishful
thinking that in the best case would drag on for years. Even if we get
VGA
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:30:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
> > > only works for ancient
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
> > only works for ancient GMCH-based IGD devices and attempted to update
> > support for newer HD
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
> only works for ancient GMCH-based IGD devices and attempted to update
> support for newer HD devices. Unfortunately newer devices cannot
> completely opt-out of
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
only works for ancient GMCH-based IGD devices and attempted to update
support for newer HD devices. Unfortunately newer devices cannot
completely opt-out of VGA
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
only works for ancient GMCH-based IGD devices and attempted to update
support for newer HD devices.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:30:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 21:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:20:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
only works for ancient GMCH-based
Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
only works for ancient GMCH-based IGD devices and attempted to update
support for newer HD devices. Unfortunately newer devices cannot
completely opt-out of VGA arbitration like the old devices could.
The VGA I/O space cannot be
Commit 81b5c7bc found that the current VGA arbiter support in i915
only works for ancient GMCH-based IGD devices and attempted to update
support for newer HD devices. Unfortunately newer devices cannot
completely opt-out of VGA arbitration like the old devices could.
The VGA I/O space cannot be
20 matches
Mail list logo
