On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 11:28 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >> Can you test just the one liner fix below?
> >>
> @@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
> isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
> {
> struct isert_conn *isert_conn = wc->qp->qp_context;
> -
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 11:28 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >> Can you test just the one liner fix below?
> >>
> @@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
> isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
> {
> struct isert_conn *isert_conn = wc->qp->qp_context;
> -
Can you test just the one liner fix below?
@@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
struct isert_conn *isert_conn = wc->qp->qp_context;
- struct ib_device *ib_dev = isert_conn->cm_id->device;
+ struct ib_device *ib_dev =
Can you test just the one liner fix below?
@@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
struct isert_conn *isert_conn = wc->qp->qp_context;
- struct ib_device *ib_dev = isert_conn->cm_id->device;
+ struct ib_device *ib_dev =
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:36:51AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >Just tested this patch, I wasn't able to reproduce the NULL pointer
> >dereference or any other bugs, so this fix seems safe enough to me.
> >
> >Tested-by: Andrea Righi
>
> Can you test just the one
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:36:51AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >Just tested this patch, I wasn't able to reproduce the NULL pointer
> >dereference or any other bugs, so this fix seems safe enough to me.
> >
> >Tested-by: Andrea Righi
>
> Can you test just the one liner fix below?
>
> >>@@
Just tested this patch, I wasn't able to reproduce the NULL pointer
dereference or any other bugs, so this fix seems safe enough to me.
Tested-by: Andrea Righi
Can you test just the one liner fix below?
@@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq
Just tested this patch, I wasn't able to reproduce the NULL pointer
dereference or any other bugs, so this fix seems safe enough to me.
Tested-by: Andrea Righi
Can you test just the one liner fix below?
@@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 04:58:04PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
...
> So I assume isert_cma_handler() -> isert_connect_error() getting called
> to clear isert_conn->cm_id before connection established, and
> subsequently isert_conn->login_req_buf->rx_cqe.done() ->
> isert_login_recv_done()
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 04:58:04PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
...
> So I assume isert_cma_handler() -> isert_connect_error() getting called
> to clear isert_conn->cm_id before connection established, and
> subsequently isert_conn->login_req_buf->rx_cqe.done() ->
> isert_login_recv_done()
Hi Andrea & Robert,
Hi Andrea, Robert, Nic and Co
We have hit this four times today. Any ideas?
[ 169.382113] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
(null)
[ 169.382152] IP: [] isert_login_recv_done+0x28/0x170
[ib_isert]
So, we spent more time to track down
Hi Andrea & Robert,
Hi Andrea, Robert, Nic and Co
We have hit this four times today. Any ideas?
[ 169.382113] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
(null)
[ 169.382152] IP: [] isert_login_recv_done+0x28/0x170
[ib_isert]
So, we spent more time to track down
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33:45AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Robert LeBlanc
> >
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33:45AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Robert LeBlanc
> > > wrote:
> > >> We have hit this four times
Hi Andrea & Robert,
(Adding HCH CC')
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 00:37 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33:45AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Robert
Hi Andrea & Robert,
(Adding HCH CC')
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 00:37 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33:45AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Robert LeBlanc
> > > wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33:45AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Robert LeBlanc
> > wrote:
> >> We have hit this four times today. Any ideas?
> >>
> >> [
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33:45AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Robert LeBlanc
> > wrote:
> >> We have hit this four times today. Any ideas?
> >>
> >> [ 169.382113] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
18 matches
Mail list logo